Skip to main content Skip to main content
 

How Safety Codes and Standards Impact Energy Use and Energy Codes Impact Safety - Finding the Right Balance without Sacrificing Safety, Energy or Resources

J. Patrick Carpenter, Kling

Objectives:

This paper will review in qualitative and quantitative terms the specific requirements of many major laboratory health, safety and ventilation standards in the context of their impact on Energy Consumption. It will compare issues such as face velocities, duct velocities room, pressurizations, ventilation rates and space conditions to illustrate how variations in each parameter potentially affect annual energy use in laboratories. Using prototype lab configurations in various locations throughout the country, the energy consumption by major end use will be shown and compared.

In addition, the requirements of several energy codes will be reviewed in the context of how they do or do not impact energy use. Among the provisions considered will be fans energy limits, minimum turndowns, heat recovery and potential safety impacts.

Findings:

Through the use of comparative table and graphics, this presentation will show which aspects of laboratory safety have the most impact on energy consumption and how some of those costs can be mitigated. In addition, I hope to illustrate how some aspects of current energy codes could potentially reduce lab safety depending on the methods employed in the design.

Labs21 Connection:

The core elements of Occupant Safety, Energy Consumption and Energy Goals and the essence of the ideas presented in this paper.

Biography:

J. Patrick Carpenter, PE, Senior Engineering Principal at Kling, a Philadelphia based Architectural-Engineering-Interior Design practice, is a nationally recognized leader in engineering systems for laboratories, animal facilities and other high technology facilities. He graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

He has worked for Kling for over 33 years and has focused on the design of engineering systems in high technology projects for corporate, government and institutional clients for over 25 years. He is responsible for the conception and development of MEP systems for many laboratory, vivarium, and data center projects. He leads the conceptual development of HVAC and utility systems with emphasis on the safety, reliability, operation effectiveness and energy conservation of engineering systems for those and other projects. Recent work includes projects for the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), University of Colorado Health Science Center, University of MD-Frostburg, Rutgers University, Food and Drug Administration, University of Virgina, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cornell University, Merck & Co., DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, and Wyeth-Ayerst.

Patrick has been active in professional organizations such as ASHRAE, AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association) and ISPE (International Society of Pharmaceutical Engineers). His ASHRAE activity includes over 18 years involvement with Technical Committees involving Laboratories and Clean Spaces, Industrial Air-Conditioning and Industrial Ventilation and Energy Calculations,. He also served for 8 years on the Standards Project Committee which rewrote the ASHRAE Standard 100.5 dealing with Energy Conservation in Existing Buildings - Institutional and served on the Standards Project Committee (SPC) which revised the ASHRAE Standard 110-95 dealing with the Performance Testing of Laboratory Fume Hoods. He is also involved with the current SPC which is revising Standard 110. He has participated in all Labs 21 Conferences over the last four years making five presentations and moderating several sessions and roundtables.

EPA Home | OARM Home | DOE Home | FEMP Home


This page is no longer updated.
EPA gave I2SL permission to house this page as a historic record of the Labs21 Annual Conference.