Skip to main content Skip to main content
 

Structural Systems for Efficient, Sustainable Laboratories

Kurt Swensson, Ph.D., KSi/Structural Engineers

Experience has shown that the structural system selected can have a large effect on the success of a laboratory project. The design of a laboratory must be considered as the design of a machine. The structure, mechanical systems, lighting, equipment, and use must be closely coordinated from the beginning of the design process. The systems must work together to maximize the efficiency and productivity of a laboratory.

Selection of the wrong system or incorrect implementation of the correct system can limit the success of a laboratory project by increasing material usage and cost, increasing floor to floor heights, utilizing disproportionate capital funds, limiting flexibility or adaptability, limiting natural day lighting, and limiting reuse of existing laboratory space.

Selection of the correct system can provide opportunities for great design by providing for efficient use of materials, flexible and adaptable spaces, and large column free spaces with ample natural light, and serviceable structures designed to support the laboratory activities.

In the laboratory facility planning process, the structural system must be coordinated with the main distribution system, the flow of material, and the movement of people while allowing for flexibility and adaptability to changing conditions. This presentation will present and discuss applications of structural systems in laboratories based on the distribution alternative. The discussion will be based on real life project experience of over 10 years with lessons learned. The discussion will also include topics dealing real life impacts of vibration and physical security concerns on the design and construction of laboratories.

Findings:

The major lessons learned include the experience and examples of approximately a six laboratory projects. The lessons include the following:

  1. Fast track design process - Because the structural frame is routinely issue months before the other systems have been designed or procured interdisciplinary communication is vital from early stages. The lab module dimension and distribution systems must be well defined early in the process. Discipline of the team is vital to a successful project; this includes good pricing information that is dependable and honored. A final coordination of all penetrations and floor depressions just prior to construction of the structural system is vital.

  2. Application of structural framing systems:

    a. Ceiling and Shaft Distribution - Shallow systems are vital. Spans may be limited. Exterior framing is vital to provide maximum natural lighting. (Georgia Public Health Laboratory and CDC Emerging Infections Disease Lab.)

    b. Vertical Interior and Exterior Shafts - Structural depth may be utilized to increase spans. Beams and columns must be located away from distribution corridors. (Manufacturing Related Discipline Laboratory at Georgia Institute of Technology)

    c. Backbone Service Corridor - Structural depths perpendicular to corridor maximized. Structure within corridor must be closely coordinated and adaptable for future penetrations. (Woodruff Memorial Building Expansion at Emory University)

    d. Interstitial Spaces - Use of light weight recycled concrete plank product applied with great success. (NIH Laboratory - Fort Collins, Colorado)

Vibration and security can be applied incorrectly with a negative impact on the cost, flexibility and performance of laboratory facilities.

Labs21 Connection:

Our approach to structural design is unique because of the level of communication and coordination exercised early in a project to maximize the efficiency and adaptability of the entire facility not just of the structural elements. Structural systems must be designed as an integral part of the laboratory system. The lessons learned in the design of over 2 million square feet of laboratory space include early communication, team building, cooperation and coordination with design, owner, and construction teams.

The application of the approach is noteworthy because of its successful application to a wide variety of laboratory projects and delivery methods. The examples include:

  • A one story steel framed laboratory that won R&D's Laboratory of the Year,
  • A multilevel concrete framed laboratory that received a LEED™ Silver Rating,
  • Vertical and horizontal laboratory expansions which allowed for revitalization of existing laboratory space
  • Integrated exterior façade systems,
    • inside out method of exterior façade construction that significantly increased the efficiency of the exterior envelope
    • coordination of structure and façade to minimize or eliminate joints in the exterior facade
  • Integrated structural and mechanical systems in BSL level 3 and 4 laboratories that create cost and schedule effective designs.

Biography:

Kurt Swensson, Ph. D., graduated Summa Cum Laude, with honors in Civil Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 1981. He then received his M.S., Civil Engineering degree from the University of Texas at Austin in 1984 where he also received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering in 1987.

Dr. Swensson serves on eight separate technical committees involved with innovative steel structures, composite structures, and seismic design; he has given numerous presentations across the country at national and international conferences. He has over thirty published articles and presentations on various topics ranging from seismic design, application of fast track design/construction procedures, to application of innovative structural systems.

Dr. Swensson has more than seventeen years of structural design and project management experience with buildings varying in type and size; from timber retail malls, to large steel and concrete-framed towers and parking garages. His experience includes the structural design of laboratory and research facilities, corporate headquarters, additions and renovations of existing facilities, commercial projects, educational facilities, stadiums and sports facilities, hospitals, and clinics. He has provided structural engineering services for laboratory projects for over 10 years representing over 2 million square feet of laboratory space in approximately 20 separate facilities.

 

Back to the Agenda

EPA Home | OARM Home | DOE Home | FEMP Home


This page is no longer updated.
EPA gave I2SL permission to house this page as a historic record of the Labs21 Annual Conference.