Skip to main content Skip to main content
 

Considering the Effect of Rooftop Structures in Modeling Exhaust Dispersion

Amit Gupta, M.Eng, Concordia University

The presentation deals with the effect of rooftop structures (RTS) on exhausts released from rooftop stacks. Most buildings have one or more RTS, which can be in the form of HVAC equipment, a penthouse, or mechanical room. Such structures can significantly alter the airflow on the building roof and may lead to plume downwash for certain geometries. Concentrations produced by exhaust sources located in the wake of an RTS may exceed the recommended standards and lead to health and odor problems depending on chemicals released.

Wind tunnel modeling was carried out for a range of RTS sizes, with aspect ratio, w/h, varying from 2.5 to 12.5, where w is the crosswind length and h is the height of RTS. The exhaust source was located at a distance of 0.5h downstream of RTS. Concentration measurements were gathered for various combinations of exhaust momentum, stack height and wind directions.

The 'amplification factorm,' a, defined as the ratio of concentration obtained on the building roof with and without RTS was obtained for all configurations. A comparison or present findings with the current design standards is also presented. A field study showing the effect of downwash caused by a roof skylight on a downwind stack is also discussed.

The study reveals that the current minimum recommended stack height of 3m suggested by standards like ASHRAE and ANSI/AIHA may not be sufficient to avoid reingestion problems when an RTS is present. It was found that in the presence of a RTS the concentrations on a high-rise building roof can increase by a factor of 100 at locations closer to the stack and a factor of 20 for locations near the leeward edge of building. For a low-rise building the amplification factor can vary from 10 to 30. However, these factors are quite sensitive to the stack location, wind direction, and exhaust parameters. It is also demonstrated how the current ASHRAE dispersion models are incapable of taking into consideration the effect of an RTS. Simple guidelines are suggested for designing an efficient exhaust and intake system for a building with rooftop structures.

Labs21 Connection:

A wind tunnel can be used as a powerful tool to model building dispersion applications. Full-scale tests are expensive and time consuming but they are still needed to validate the results predicted by empirical or physical modeling.

This presentation is consistent with the Labs21 Approach of:

  • Improved environmental quality - Designing a proper exhaust system will eliminate the problem of re-ingestion and improve air quality for the emitting building and the surrounding structures.
  • Increased health, safety, and productivity - Proper exhaust design will be beneficial to the health and safety of workers working inside and also outside the building.
  • Better understanding of air flow around buildings - The first approach for a good exhaust and intake design is to have a proper understanding of air flow around buildings.

Biography:

Amit Gupta holds a B.Eng. in civil engineering and a M.Eng in structural dynamics from Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee and currently working on his Ph.D. at Concordia University, in Montreal, Canada, in the field of environmental aerodynamics. Amit is working on issues related to exhaust and dispersion modeling. He worked previously with Risk Management Solutions India a subsidiary of RMS, California, USA in developing loss estimation models for hurricanes and earthquakes.

Back to the Agenda

EPA Home | OARM Home | DOE Home | FEMP Home


This page is no longer updated.
EPA gave I2SL permission to house this page as a historic record of the Labs21 Annual Conference.